Elections

2025 Nominee's

 

Judith Abbott:

Background

Background

Before finishing my Bachelor of Science in Physiotherapy, I completed a Bachelor of Science in Physiology from McGill University. After graduating, I worked for many years in both private practice and hospital settings in the fields of sports medicine, orthopaedics, paediatrics and geriatrics. I also had the opportunity to work with a mobile physiotherapy clinic covering sporting events and tournaments. I have taken many different courses over the years in the fields of manual therapy, myofascial release, movement imbalances and exercise prescription as well as completing all McKenzie Levels. I completed my Leadership Development Certificate at St-Mary's University in 2009. I have a passion for teaching and education and enjoyed a teaching stint at the School of Physical Therapy in Kingston, Jamaica early in my career. I truly enjoy being able to explain injuries and treatment plans to patients. Seeing them achieve their goals is very rewarding. I have a special interest in the treatment of cancer patients and being a lifelong learner, am taking courses in that field to gain more expertise.

Why does the nominee want to participate as a director on the board?

Why does the nominee want to participate as a director on the board?

Actually, I have not yet been a part of a Board of Directors. I do enjoy a challenge and see this as a great opportunity. I believe in lifelong learning and this will be a good learning experience. It will also be a nice way to get to know my fellow physiotherapists as well. Hopefully my life experience brings something new to the Board.

What does the Nominee bring to the position?

What does the Nominee bring to the position?

I feel that I am a good teammate so that will help in supporting others. I am dedicated and I think I'll be helpful in achieving the Board's goals. I also feel that I am very respectful of others and am a good listener. I'm practical and I also ask a lot of questions which hopefully is a good trait. I think I have good judgement and this will help with decision making.

 

Mark (Jonathan) McFarland:

Background

Background

I graduated from Dalhousie University in 1993 with a Bachelor of Science in Physiotherapy. Over the past 31 years, I have had the privilege of practicing in a variety of clinical and management settings. My primary focus has been in private practice, where I continue to provide clinical services and manage the responsibilities of owning a multidisciplinary healthcare centre. This diverse experience has equipped me with a comprehensive understanding of the physiotherapy field and the challenges faced by both practitioners and patients.    Throughout my career, I have been dedicated to continuous learning and professional development. I have attended numerous workshops, seminars, and courses to stay abreast of the latest advancements in physiotherapy. My commitment to lifelong learning ensures that I bring current, evidence-based practices to my clinical work and my contributions to the board.

Why do you want to join/continue as a director on the board?

Why do you want to join/continue as a director on the board?

I am deeply committed to the profession of physiotherapy and believe that it is essential to 'give back' to our community. Serving on the board allows me to contribute to the continued success and integrity of our self-regulated profession. I am passionate about ensuring that we uphold the highest standards of practice and that we support our colleagues in delivering exceptional care to our patients.   As a board member, I see my role as an advocate for both practitioners and patients. I want to help shape policies that promote professional growth, safeguard public trust, and ensure the sustainability of our practice. Additionally, I believe that fostering a supportive and collaborative environment within our professional community is crucial for innovation and excellence. By joining the board, I hope to facilitate open communication and collaboration among practitioners, educators, and regulatory bodies.

What do you bring (or have brought) to the position?

What do you bring (or have brought) to the position?

My extensive experience in the private sector provides a unique perspective that complements the strengths and expertise of my fellow board members. I bring a hands-on understanding of the day-to-day operations and challenges within a clinical setting. Additionally, I am at a stage in my career where I can dedicate the necessary time and effort to support the NSCP’s mission of good governance. I am committed to fostering a collaborative environment that encourages innovation and excellence in our profession.   In my current role, I have developed strong leadership and organizational skills, which are essential for effective board service. I have successfully managed a multidisciplinary healthcare centre, overseeing both clinical and administrative functions. This experience has honed my ability to navigate complex issues, make informed decisions, and implement strategies that enhance service delivery and patient outcomes.   Moreover, I am a strong advocate for patient-centered care and ethical practice. I believe that our primary responsibility is to the patients we serve, and I am dedicated to upholding the ethical standards that ensure their well-being and trust. My goal is to work with the board to develop policies and initiatives that promote transparency, accountability, and excellence in all aspects of physiotherapy practice.

 

Ann Nelson:

Background

Background

Ann graduated with her Bachelor of Science in physiotherapy from Dalhousie University in 1992. She started work at the Nova Scotia Rehabilitation Centre with neurology, amputee, and chronic pain caseloads. She left the hospital setting in 1994 for private practice. Starting primarily as a clinician she began to do some marketing and management roles. She worked in human resources for a large private physiotherapy company for almost 3 years. With two children she decided to return to the hospital setting and in 2001 started a position at the QEII Health Sciences Centre. She has worked primarily in geriatrics and orthopedics since that time. She started at the Geriatric Day Hospital and Falls Clinic, as well as the Transitional Care Unit in 2003. She completed a Point of Care Research pilot program looking at ways to help her patients maintain their improvements. She then became full time during the pandemic at the GDH and Falls Clinic and has really enjoyed this transition to Geriatric Medicine Outpatient Services.

Why does the nominee want to participate as a director on the board?

Why does the nominee want to participate as a director on the board?

Ann has always been interested in regulation and has served on the NSCP Board earlier in her career. When she was at the AGM last year, she felt it was time to get back into the regulatory world as she has seen many changes in the profession and wanted to help with the migration to the Health Professions Act.

What does the Nominee bring to the position?

What does the Nominee bring to the position?

Ann brings a willingness to read the background information, to keep up on the regulatory world and to share over 32 years of practice knowledge. She will work hard, show up to meetings and always enjoys participating and having deep discussions to make sure the public of NS are protected, and the board is a respectful space.

 

Michael Sangster:

 

Background

Background

I am a graduate of the Dalhousie University School of Physiotherapy (Class of 2003), the Master of Business Administration program at Saint Mary’s University, and the Doctor of Physical Therapy program at Utica University. Additionally, I hold Specialist Certification in Pain Science through the Canadian Physiotherapy Association. I bring both public and private practice experience to the NSCP as both the former Physiotherapist on the Pediatric Complex Pain team at the IWK Health Centre and a current Physiotherapist at One to One Wellness in Halifax. I am also an Adjunct Clinical Associate at the Dalhousie University School of Physiotherapy. I am passionate about research in practice and teaching. To this end, I am a contributing author to the Oxford Textbook of Pediatric Pain, a TEDx speaker, a co-developer of the online pediatric pain curriculum at SickKids and have numerous peer reviewed publications and conference presentations. I have served as a member of the Board of Directors for 14 years (6 years (2009 - 2015), 6 years (2016 - 2022)), and then re-elected for the last 2 years (2023 - present)). In my tenure, I have served as Chair, Vice Chair, and Past Chair of the Board of the NSCP and as Chair of the Peer Assessment Committee and member of the Investigations Committee.

Why do you want to join/continue as a director on the board?

Why do you want to join/continue as a director on the board?

I believe in the privilege of self-regulation and wish to continue to serve on the Board to maintain a fair and balanced approach to the regulation of Physiotherapy in Nova Scotia. I believe that over the past 14 years, the Board has found this balance in upholding the mission of the NSCP while fostering a collaborative and professional culture with our membership. I believe that this partnership with the Physiotherapists in Nova Scotia is critical to success in self-regulation and wish to continue to serve the Nova Scotia public, the Board, and our membership in ensuring the highest quality Physiotherapy services.

What do you bring (or have brought) to the position?

What do you bring (or have brought) to the position?

In my tenure on the Board, I have served in numerous roles and have vast experience in Board leadership. As Co-Chair and Chair of the selection committees responsible for the hiring of our first and second, executive directors. Through this committee, I was involved in the development of the first performance review process for our staff. In my first six-year tenure on the Board, as Vice-Chair and Chair, I worked to bring much needed fiscal health and order to the NSCP. The NSCP now serves as an example of a College that has a sound fiscal position and robust financial management processes. As Chair of the Peer Assessment Committee, I worked diligently, with our committee, to ensure a fair and balanced process for Peer Assessment. Peer review is one of the primary functions of a College and we have proudly produced an assessment process that other provinces have sought to model. Finally, I have served on the Investigations Committee which has provided me great insight into the nature of public complaints and the establishment of a fair and appropriate process for supporting all stakeholders. It has been a privilege to serve the NSCP over the past 14 years. I hope to continue in the good work of this Board and to assist all of us in the mission to ensure the highest quality Physiotherapy services in Nova Scotia.

Public Consultations

The Nova Scotia College of Physiotherapists (NSCP) is seeking feedback on the following proposed Practice Standards.  These Standards have been reviewed and adapted as needed from the Core Standards of Practice for Canadian Physiotherapists (2023), which was updated from the previous iteration in 2016.  These Standards were developed to reflect current and future practice trends and have been adopted nationally.

Your input is invaluable in shaping the standards that guide physiotherapy practice in Nova Scotia.

Please review the proposed NSCP Practice Standards below and respond to this survey by April 30, 2025.

NSCP keeps all feedback provided confidential.  Individuals names are not connected with specific feedback.  

 Proposed NSCP Practice Standards

Welcome Mark McFarland to the BOD

July 8, 2024

NSCP is  pleased to announce Mark McFarland has been acclaimed to the recently vacated board Director position.  Mark is a Dalhousie University graduate and has 31 years experience practicing in a variety of clinical and management settings.   His primary focus has been in private practice, where he continues to provide clinical services and manage the responsibilities of owning a multidisciplinary healthcare centre. 

Mark is passionate about ensuring that the highest standards of practice are upheld stating, “I am a strong advocate for patient-centered care and ethical practice. I believe that our primary responsibility is to the patients we serve, and I am dedicated to upholding the ethical standards that ensure their well-being and trust. My goal is to work with the board to develop policies and initiatives that promote transparency, accountability, and excellence in all aspects of physiotherapy practice.”  

Please join us in welcoming Mark to the NSCP Board.

RFP Digital Practices 2025

The Nova Scotia College of Physiotherapists (NSCP) invites proposals from qualified vendors to update our database and website infrastructure by summer 2025.  NSCP is a relatively small organization operating within a virtual office environment. This project is an important aspect of our ongoing journey to modernize and enhance operational capabilities.  There are 3 distinct but integrated projects we are seeking a vendor to provide: 

  • Database update 
  • Website update 
  • Productivity tools configuration 

This project will be informed by and integrated with 2 concurrent projects: migration to the Regulated Health Professions Act (RHPA), and migration to the 2022 Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) dataset. With the changes required to meet the needs of an updated Act and Regulations and the new dataset requirements, we have decided to embrace the opportunity for a holistic approach to the update of our digital practices. Please download the RFP for detailed project requirements.

Interim Competency Evaluation Application

The Nova Scotia College of Physiotherapists has developed an Interim Competency Evaluation process that will be utilized whenever a national clinical evaluation is unavailable for a period of 12 months or more. Application resources for the Interim Competency Evaluation process are listed below.  Click on the links to download. 

When, applying please complete all forms in the electronic format provided and submit completed applications via email with supporting documents to info@nsphysio.com. Only complete applications including all documents and complete application form will be accepted.

Sponsors and Employers/Managers must send their reports/letters directly to info@nsphysio.com.

Sponsor portal and member portal are not monitored for uploaded documents. Please email info@nsphysio.com to inform NSCP if any documents have been uploaded via the portal.

Please complete all forms in the electronic format provided and submit completed applications via email with supporting documents to info@nsphysio.com.  Sponsors and Employers/Managers should send their reports/letters independently to the Registrar and include the name of the PT Resident applying. 

Resource  Description
For Applicants
References 
Application Guide Detailed instructions for applicants (PDF)
Paying Fees Fee schedule is available here.  Contact info@nsphysio.com for details on paying the fee. 
Forms
Application Form Application form in MSExcel.  
Competency Self Assessment  Self assessment practice review activity focused on the Competency Profile for Physiotherapists in Canada
Self Reflection - Learning Needs Self-reflection assessment on process for identifying learning needs (MSWord)
Self Reflection - Patient Care Self-reflection on patient care experience to submit with chart notes (personal identifiers redacted) (MSWord)
Self Reflection - Professional Self-reflection on professional behaviours (MS Word)
For Sponsors 
Clinical Practice Report Guidelines   Guidelies for completing clinical practice reports
Final Sponsor Report 3-part report including Sponsor Questionairre, Feedback Form and Professional Behaviour Rubric (MSWord)
Chart Audit Tool  Checklist for chart audits
For Employers/Managers 
Directions for letter of support A support letter from the Manager (or Employer if there is no manager) in each of the applicant's practice sites must be provided.  The letter should include a statement regarding potential or realized professional or practice issues along with explanation and resolution.    

FAQ

I sponsored a resident in the past year but I'm not currently their sponsor. Do they need me to complete the final sponsor report or is it just their current sponsor that completes that form?

In most cases the final report will only be required from the most recent sponsor, since the committee is most interested in current competency. There may be situations where multiple sponsors will need to complete the final report to ensure the committee has the right information to make their decision. If an applicant is unsure they can contact Joan Ross, Registrar at registrar@nsphysio.com to confirm.

I work for NSH; what is the process for releasing the required chart notes to the committee?

NSH Privacy staff are aware of the Interim Competency Evaluation requirements. Applicants that are employed by NSH will need to email chart requests to Privacy@nshealth.ca with the following information:
  • Requesting Physiotherapy Resident's information:
    • Name
    • NSCP License number
  • Patient's information:
    • First and Last name
    • Health Card Number or Date of Birth (or both is great)
    • Location or Hospital Site where the visit happened
    • Date(s) of assessment, or date range.
    • Include details of records required (initial assessment to discharge and all relevant physiotherapy progress notes/supporting documents).
NSH Privacy office will redact the patient identifiers once they receive the records and will then provide them to the NSCP Registrar.

The estimated turnaround time for the request is approximately 3 weeks depending on workload.

How long will it take to receive a decision on my application through ICE?

The timelines in the ICE policy have been updated to ensure the committee is not impeded in its public protection/interest mandate and to allow for applicants to have realistic expectations of the length of time from submission to response. The policy no longer refers to a 20-business day response time from the time of receiving applications. This arbitrary timeline does not reflect the reality of the process nor the current situation in relation to the number of eligible applicants and anticipated applications. The Committee will move the applications forward as expediently as possible. Timelines for processing applications will be monitored and once reasonable estimates are available, they will be published. This will allow applicants to have realistic expectations of the length of time from submission to response.

Why is a letter from the manager/employer required? Does the Resident see that letter?

The letter of support is intended to provide opportunity for the manager/employer to report on whether or not there were any practice or behaviour issues that may have been reported and/or dealt with internally. The letter is sent directly to teh Registrar to be shared with teh Committee and the Resident does not see it.

Does a Sponsor have to complete and submit practice review forms after submitting the final evaluation report?

Until the committee has made a decision the applicant is still a resident. After submitting the final report the sponsor may pause on the reporting but must continue the sponsor/resident relationship until the committee has communicated a decision on the application.

Once I reach the 1200 hours can I take a break until the 6 months are up?

Practice is meant to be continuous work over a 6 month period to consolidate knowledge and skills. We say "6 month minimum" to acknowledge that there may be a break, such as a medical or parental leave, that may impact meeting all the criteria and that in certain circumstances the 6 month requirement may take longer to fulfil.

Has the eligibility criteria changed? I thought residency was for 12 months? Why change to 6 months?

In February 2023 the 12 month time requirement was decreased to 6 months. This was done based on a review of the applications submitted up to that point. After 6 months there was very little change in sponsor reports, with all observable competencies being noted as met within 6 months.

More Articles ...